CALCULUS
The Elements
by Michael Comenetz (St John's College, USA)
"This book is unlike any other calculus book I have seen. It is an
extremely scholarly work, by a pure mathematician with research
credentials, as well as years of teaching experience, whose goal seems
to be to explain the ideas behind the calculus, as well as its origins
and applications, to the intelligent and curious but mathematically
unsophisticated beginner, even lay persons. Repeatedly, in reading
it, I have found cogent explanations of observations which are omitted
in other books, and which I have myself formed a habit of adding to
the courses I teach. But there are also many explanations I have never
thought of including in my courses.
Often in calculus courses, it is tempting to present the material in
its purely mathematical form, into which it has evolved over several
centuries. To reduce prerequisites, we delete many applications to
physics, leaving only a few illustrations in geometry. The reciprocal
relationship between derivative and integral is usually "established"
at least theoretically, by proving the fundamental theorem of
calculus, which students unfortunately remember only as a
computational device for computing areas. Of the two parts of the FTC,
the first part is dismissed and largely misunderstood by the average
student, and the second part is memorized as a rule for
calculating. Professor Comenetz takes a different approach, aimed at
conveying first an intuitive grasp of the ideas calculus is designed
to capture and measure, before presenting their mathematical
formulation. Once these ideas have been made familiar through several
well chosen examples, he gradually makes the concepts more precise and
explains how they are rendered into mathematics, i.e. how physical
quantities become numbers, and finally how they may be computed.
There are many possible goals one can attempt in teaching. E.g.
| 1) |
How does one carry out computations? |
| 2) |
Why are the computational procedures correct? |
| 3) |
What are the computations good for? |
| 4) |
How did people think of these procedures, or how could one do so by analyzing examples? |
| 5) |
How can one acquire an intuitive "feel" for
the methods? |
It is increasingly common, and easier, to address only question 1, or
1 and 3, i.e. to teach only for "competency" as opposed to
understanding. It is striking that in this book, with only about 400
pages of text, and not too heavy to carry around, the author has made
an honest attempt to do all of the above. This book is far from a
cookbook for the below average student. It is a scholarly,
meticulously written explanation of calculus for the intelligent
person who wants to understand the subject.
This text differs radically from other calculus books I have seen. In
contrast to the depressing trend of books titled something like
"Calculus for dummies", whose goal is to program people to perform
computations they do not understand, this book makes a serious and
well thought out attempt to thoroughly explain the ideas of
calculus. Even the most successful students of a standard calculus
course come away thinking perhaps that a derivative measures slope,
and an integral measures area. Professor Comenetz makes it absolutely
clear with many examples that integral and derivative are not specific
quantities, but relationships between pairs of quantities. I.e. there
are many pairs such that the first is the integral of the second, and
equivalently the second is the derivative of the first, such as (area,
height) and (rise, slope), but also (mass, density), (increase in
volume, rate of flow), (momentum, force), and others. As a
mathematician with over thirty years research and teaching experience,
but little grasp of physics, I had not realized the simple nature of
some of these pairings before reading this book. And it is not
everyday that I learn something from an introductory calculus book.
After reading this text, from an author who has taken his thorough
understanding of the concepts involved, deepened and refined them by a
scholarly investigation of their origins, and allowed them to mature
over decades of teaching at a school where excellent teaching is of
paramount importance, I will not be able to ignore the message of it,
even in courses where it is not the book of choice. I have tried for
years to teach my students to understand and remember the statements
of the fundamental theorem of calculus, realizing slowly that the
primary hindrance is the mathematical notation and formulation of the
concepts. This book takes the now seemingly obvious logical step of
teaching the concepts by example, before introducing the notation, and
only then to render it more precise, and more abstract. I.e. it is
hard to argue with the philosophy of this book, to teach a concept
well, one should first teach the ideas, as they actually arose, and
only afterward should one abstract them and render them into
mathematical language. Indeed this language was invented as a means of
rendering into mathematics, physical ideas which have all too often
been omitted from current calculus courses, as too time consuming to
discuss.
In spite of taking an example oriented approach to the introduction to
calculus, this book still presents a perfectly rigorous, i.e. correct
and precise, account of the logical development of the mathematical
part of the subject. I.e. proofs are given, and they are clearly
written, and are logically correct in every respect. This book is thus
not only more intuitive in its approach to calculus, but also more
logically rigorous in its discussion of the theoretical side than is
usual. That is not to say it is exhaustive. The approach here to the
theory of calculus parallels that taken to the intuition behind
calculus. I.e. it is intended not only that the proofs should be
valid , but that one should understand them. Two features make this
more likely in the present book than in many others.
First of all the arguments are scrupulously correct, and presented by
someone who clearly not only understands them thoroughly, but has even
researched their origins in the history of mathematical writing. For
the lay person let me say that it is common in mathematics texts for
authors to continue to present arguments which have become traditional
in the most popular books, for various reasons, even if superior
arguments were in existence in earlier works. This does not occur in
the present book. Professor Comenetz often presents, instead of the
most common recent argument for a given result, either one of his own
creation, or the most insightful one to be found anywhere in the
literature, and his familiarity with that literature extends to Isaac
Newton and Euclid. As an example, the existence of the integral of a
continuous function, is the result usually stated but not proved in
most beginning texts. Some will even present a proof but one offering
little useful information to a beginner. Instead this book contains a
clear and elementary proof for the existence of the integral of a
monotone function, which I learned from the excellent text of Apostol.
Professor Comenetz gives it clearly and succinctly and then cites a
reference for it in the Principia of Isaac Newton which I have never
been aware of before.
After making clear with this elementary argument the essential point
of an existence proof for integrals, he later introduces the concept
of uniform continuity, which is needed for the general argument
involving continuous functions. Instead of sweeping aside entirely
the argument that all continuous functions on a closed bounded
interval are in fact uniformly continuous, he observes that from what
has already been explained, the result is easy for continuously
differentiable functions, a class which comprises all examples any
standard course will treat.
This approach is taken throughout. I.e. when a theorem has a
difficult proof, instead of brutally presenting it, or callously
omitting it, Professor Comenetz illustrates the key idea by giving a
proof of an easier case, and then points out how to enhance the
argument to reach the more difficult case. This style of explanation
is well chosen to guide the serious beginner.
In reference to the Fundamental theorem of calculus, even the
statement surprised me. Although in essence the statement is
equivalent to the usual one, it has been carefully and intelligently
phrased so as to reveal more perfectly than I have ever seen, the
perfect duality between the integral and derivative. This is indeed an
unusually thoughtful and scholarly book, especially for one aimed at
the beginner. A course based on it would in my opinion definitely have
a much greater chance of producing students who understand the
structure, uses, and arguments of calculus, than is usually the case.
Another unusual feature of this book is its attempt to incorporate the
concept of "infinitesimals" into the discussion. In reading these
sections I admit to feeling some kinship with Bishop Berkeley who
complained of his inability to understand Newton. After almost 40
years of personal mathematical atheism, the author almost persuades me
to believe in infinitesimals, and he certainly makes me want
to. Although I have always preferred the simplicity of the pure
mathematical formulation of calculus, after reading this book it is
hard to be satisfied with only that. There seems no doubt that the
long experience of the author in teaching at a school (St. Johns
College) where the reading of original texts is a hallowed
institution, has very beneficially influenced his preparation for this
work.
As to pedagogy, consider the advantage of thinking of the integral and
derivative as illustrating concepts the student already believes to be
inverse, as opposed to trying to force on him the reciprocal nature of
two ideas which are both defined only mathematically. Thus after
taking the time to illustrate that the density of a wire at a point is
approximated by its average densities over nearby intervals, and
reciprocally that the mass of a small segment of wire where the
density varies only slightly, is approximated by that of a wire of
uniform density, it becomes almost trivial to believe that the
integral and derivative (abstract versions of mass and density)
determine each other in the same way. In the more standard example,
area under a graph over a short interval where the height varies only
slightly, is approximated by that of a graph of constant height, and
reciprocally the height of a graph at a point is approximated by the
quotient of the area taken over a small interval containing that
point, divided by the width of that interval.
These are examples of the author's philosophy that a mathematical
definition should not be attempted until the concept involved has been
sufficiently explained so that the reader can well judge whether the
abstract definition presented does indeed capture the idea which is to
be made precise. If we mathematicians would begin again to ask
ourselves about the origins, applications, and meaning, of our
symbols, we may regain the interest and appreciation of the public, of
our colleagues in other disciplines, and of our students. This book is
a good start in the right direction. I recommend this work to high
school and college teachers looking for a book from which they and
their students are likely to learn much about calculus and about
pedagogy, as well as to the scientifically curious layman. There are
certainly other excellent and classic calculus books available (such
as those by Courant, or Apostol, or even Sylvanus P. Thompson), but in
my opinion many recent and popular works on the topic will appear
intellectually sterile after exposure to this one. The only challenge
which the author has not attempted is that of trying to explain the
calculus to readers who do not read English well. Virtually every
sentence in this book says exactly what the author intended it to, but
it may require some reflection. This is no doubt intended. Wherever
there are students for whom phrases like "rectilinear motion" do not
require to be rendered into words of at most 2 syllables, as "motion
along a straight line", this book will be very useful and stimulating
indeed.
Although it contains relatively few routine computational
problems,these are easily added from a workbook like Schaum's outline
series. I actually prefer a book which offers a small number of
thoughtful problems which the student should work all of, instead of a
huge number which can (and will) mostly be ignored. Oh yes, at under
$40 from Amazon.com (in paper), this book is a great bargain in
comparison to many decidedly inferior works at over $100."
Roy Smith
Professor of Mathematics
University of Georgia, Athens, GA
Back